PE CoffeeHaus Blog

Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.

To Believe or Not to Believe

March 26, 2012
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
Some people claim that companies are designing products that require the consumer to pollute.

Apple manufactures a number of products. Their latest products include the iPhone and the iPad. These are great pieces of equipment that have revolutionized the communication and entertainment markets. The company has always been known as a company that did not want to allow third party penetration to their products. In other words, they do their best to assure that the consumer can only buy peripheral products from Apple.

Their latest products have grabbed the attention of the entire world, and made the company huge sums of money. Great job. Consider that if the battery wears out, the consumer has to return the product to the company for repair. The simple process of changing batteries is not supposed to be allowed. Having said that, some enterprising people have developed products to allow the consumer to change their own battery. Of course, Apple will never service the product again.

Now, I am pretty sure the company decided that most consumers are ready to move on after two years anyway. The price to replace the battery will certainly contribute to that decision. According to an interview on Leo LaPort's Internet TWIT network show, the iPhone and iPad cause recyclers problems to process because they are glued together and difficult to dismantle. The lithium ion batteries could even cause disastrous problems in a shredder.

This caused me to want to learn more about this ubiquitous product. Is it really destroying our landfills?

My conclusion is that the Apple products are not causing environmental problems. While some recyclers may have a problem, there are plenty of ways to properly dispose of the equipment. Most recyclers and Apple will offer something back for products submitted for recycle. Just type iPhone and recycle into a search engine and there are plenty of places. Most electronic stores will have a recycle bin. Just make sure to remove any personal information from the phone first.

According to the Apple website, the company is achieving about 70 percent recycle of their products. I disagree with their calculation method as they are using a seven-year product life cycle. That is a number that is commonly used by business to calculate the life cycle of computer equipment. I am not so sure it fits iPhones or iPads life cycles. Their numbers are still impressive.

This was a good lesson for me. I listened to a trusted source and believed the worst-case description of a company. But, as I delved into the story further, I found it to not be true. Understand that this is not a company whose products I buy. I find their attempts to design products to eliminate any competition to be off putting. However, I also must acknowledge information that I find to be incorrect. To be fair to Mr. LaPort, he was interviewing someone in his studio and had no choice but to accept the information he was told at face value, so Leo was mislead as well. Having listened to his shows for many years, I am sure he would have corrected the information later. On the other hand, he has mentioned a number of times his feud with Apple so maybe not.
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Letters in April issue

Bob Fowler
April 11, 2012
Roy, Several people wrote letters in your April issue, chastising you for stating that "from a business standpoint, re-newable energy is not worth the investment". They try to guilt-trip you into feeling bad for stating the truth, and make you out to be anti-green and anti-environment and practically anti-American. I would challenge those people to "get off their a&$" (as one gentle writer put it) and make those re-newable energy sources economically-viable. Those "evil" coal, nuclear, oil and gas energy sources provide over 85% of our power requirements, so let's "put up or shut up" Greenies. Time to make re-newables economically-viable, or quit vilifying the energy sources that are carrying the load.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers.

Included are some of the impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates and different bases to raise aquifer pH.

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead, R&D, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn