PE CoffeeHaus Blog

Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.

CO2 Rumors and Copenhagen

November 20, 2009
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

While President Obama and his staff met with their counterparts in China earlier this week, there were high expectations that the United States and China would have an agreement on the table when the two major powers met with others in Copenhagen. They hoped to be able to set the tone at the meetings. Companies in the U.S. are eagerly watching the developments so they can make proper plans.

Some of the meeting planners said earlier that they did not think there would be any real meaningful goals coming from this meeting. Their hopes were that the meetings would result in agreements to set further studies and panels that would meet over the next year and agree on a timetable that would lead to establishing goals.

Obama's staff has said it is not acceptable to come out of the meetings with only a timetable for additional meetings and real limits should be discussed in Copenhagen. However, the meetings with China did not result in an agreement between the two nations. China is concerned that forcing CO2 emission limits and timetables on them would damage their economy. Some officials have quietly conceded that the rhetoric in the coming days would not stress the control of CO2 but rather focus on the idea that developing green technology will lead to more jobs around the world and that would have a net impact on climate change.

Obama's team has said they hope that the Congress in the U.S. will complete a climate bill by the time the conference kicks off so they can declare we are serious about CO2 control. Personally, I don't think that will happen.

A telling comment comes from the United Nation's Copenhagen conference website that reads, "Apart from the U.S., all industrialized countries have given targets for their greenhouse gas emission reductions." So, I guess that means the U.N. does not consider China to be an industrialized nation. While most of the world's industrial output has been negative the last year, China has been positive. While they used to enjoy double-digit industrial growth, they took steps as the world recession kicked into high gear and managed to maintain positive growth pretty much throughout this period. The Forecast for 2009 is for 10.5 percent growth. They enjoy a positive trade agreement with most countries.

So, at this point in time, I would expect that there will be a lot of finger pointing at the upcoming meetings and the agreements will be for more studies and further meetings. I hope the U.S. representatives do not allow us to promise more than we should be delivering and keep us at an economic disadvantage. I will keep watching and try to post updates about the meetings on Twitter.
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn