PE CoffeeHaus Blog

Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.

Paper or Plastic

August 17, 2009
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

The argument continues over what is better to use, plastic or paper bags. Purists will insist that the answer is neither. According to them, we should carry reusable bags. After watching a young bagger struggle to balance the bag while filling it and then have it fall over when placed into the cart, I believe it is likely to spread the contents of the bag in the trunk even more, leaving the hapless consumer having to repack them in order to move the merchandise from the car to the home. A definite disadvantage in the winter in my part of the country.

Paper supporters claim they are saving the environment. Indeed, I saw one paper bag on the Internet that had a commentary printed on it claiming that this bag is made of recycled paper and NO trees were destroyed to make the bag. I guess they just forgot about the original trees that gave up its fibrous content to make an original paper product. It must have sounded like a good idea at the time. Plastic supporters also have a number or reasons that paper is not so good for the environment. First, it requires power and water to manufacture the paper bags. Paper is magnitudes heavier than plastic and therefore requires more energy to deliver paper products than the same number of plastic bags. Paper is more expensive. Paper claims that plastic takes 300 years to break down. Plastic claims that paper breaks down, but emits methane gas while it does. Seems to me paper could also evolve CO2 gas. However, these should be moot points since both are recyclable.

To me, it doesn’t really matter. The exception would be when I need a quick costume for one of the grandkids. I would never use a plastic bag as a mask but paper gives me a lot of possibilities.

Here is what really gets my craw though. Again, it is the politicians that decide they need to tell me how to live my life. Some places have outright banned plastic bag use. Other cities are looking at adding a per bag extra charge. A consumer group is currently battling against Seattle's proposal to charge and extra $0.20 per bag. The city does not want anybody to use paper or plastic and the city fathers believe they know better than their constituents. Other cities are carefully watching the outcome of this fight. If the city wins, you can believe others will leap to quickly increase your tax by calling it a per bag fee.
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Story Update

Roy Bigham
August 19, 2009
The Seattle bag fee was put to the voters on Tuesday, August 18, 2009. With about half the ballots counted by Wednesday, it appears that the per bag fee will fizzle out with 58 percent against and 42 percent for it. Disposable bag makers outspent the lobby for companies that make reusable bags by 15 to 1. However, the losers took solice in the knowledge that they succeeded in raising awarness of the issue.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn