PE CoffeeHaus Blog

Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.

No Change in the Policy of Broken Promises

March 18, 2009
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

I and many others gave President Bush a hard time when he changed his course on getting the coal-fired power industry to conform with the Clean Air Act rules.

We all want clean air. We also want affordable energy. When it gets really hot in August, we want to be able to run our air conditioners and not have the power company tell us there is not enough to go around so each person can only have cool air for 5 minutes out of every hour.

During the last campaign for president, both candidates used energy reform as a major platform. Both acknowledged that it is important to reduce our dependence on overseas oil and to provide electricity to the masses that they can afford. Both agreed that we need long-term and short-term answers. Both agreed that coal and nuclear would provide short-term solutions and Obama said coal could be a long-term solution as well. To hear his 30 second spot, go to www.youtube.com/watch?v=GehK7Q_QxPc.

By now, everyone knows that the so-called stimulus plan cuts support for coal-fired power. New transmission infrastructure is included but only if it carries a very large percentage of power provided from alternative energy sources. That means that the new cables will not be routed to help any new plants built for coal or nuclear power generation. The new tax on carbon will assure the cost of providing power with coal will make it unaffordable for the poor. The government wants to make coal energy more expensive because the cost of alternatives have not yet reached the development stage to be able to compete with coal in cost. Obama and Biden now claim there is no such thing as clean coal and it can't be done.

Last week, Department of Energy Secretary Chu announced that the Yucca Mountain depository was unacceptable. All activity would be halted and a new direction sought. This is after having spent over $13 billion dollars preparing the site and the monitoring plans. We need that facility now. Any new plans will take decades before they would be usable. Another fine example of the distain this administration seems to have on the concept of fiscal responsibility.

Talk is the only thing that is cheap these days. We need to see responsible action coming from Washington. Administrator Jackson learned that her department will receive the largest budget ever for the EPA. It is about 30 percent more than last year if the proposed budget is approved. Let's hope she uses it wisely and not just politically.
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers.

Included are some of the impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates and different bases to raise aquifer pH.

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead, R&D, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn