PE CoffeeHaus Blog

Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.

EPA Quietly Pushes Out Regulatory Agenda

The EPA is supposed to publish their agenda for regulations in April and October of each year. That did not happen in 2012.

January 4, 2013
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
The EPA has always published their plans for regulations twice a year in April and October as required by law. For whatever reason, that did not happen in 2012. Industry has not been able to make plans or react as they normally would. Some people have likened this action by the agency as if watching the old carnival shell game and it is up to the so-called mark to find the nut.

For all of the conspiracy enthusiasts reading this, the EPA did finally release their agenda for 2012 – but not until late in the day on the Friday before Christmas and there was no press release sent out. One might think the release of the agenda would be a pretty big deal. On the EPA home page, they have rotating news items they think the public would be most interested in reading. In that space they have a story about Radon month, soot regulations, they continue to attack the car industry with their fuel economy guidelines, and they have a feature on how to properly set a fire.

The agency has a page set aside just to list all of the regulatory agendas that have been published. The newest edition is not there. I went to the newsroom page and searched through the news releases. It is not there.

However, I did notice a news item that I had previously missed. Industry and associations have been waiting for the final version of the popularly noted Boiler MACT rule. That same Friday before Christmas, they released the following, EPA Finalizes Clean Air Standards for Industrial Boilers, Incinerators and Cement Kilns/Updated rules provide extensive public health protections, cut costs of compliance.

I will keep looking for the regulatory agenda and will post the URL for it on our social media pages for our followers once I find it. According to a story on the Fox News website, the EPA is estimating that the cost of the new requirements for boiler emission control would run somewhere between $53 million and $350 million. To me, that is a very large range. The EPA further said that court ordered changes actually lowered compliance costs by $1.5 billion and that most boilers would be able to comply through routine maintenance.

According to the American Action Forum, the regulations passed in 2012 would total more than $241 billion in compliance costs to industry and require 156.4 million hours per year in paperwork preparation. The EPA requirements alone add $123 billion in compliance costs and it will take an additional 13 million man hours per year to fill out the paperwork.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers.

Included are some of the impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates and different bases to raise aquifer pH.

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead, R&D, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

June 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 June

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

XL Pipeline

The Sec. of State is expected to decide if he should approve the XL Pipeline. Should he approve it?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn