General Industry News

The Dog Ate My Boiler MACT

EPA seeks new timetable for reducing pollution from boilers and incinerators

The EPA is asking the courts to give them more time to come up with a new, tougher control strategy for boiler and solid waste incinerators. The District Court for the District of Columbia, after knocking down a Bush-era proposed rule, gave the agency until Jan. 16, 2011 to come up with its replacement. The agency submitted a proposal in the Federal Register in June (pdf), but has been struggling to respond to almost 5,000 public comments on the rule. The agency would like to see that deadline extended to April 2012.

The current proposal would issue national emission standards for control of hazardous air pollutants from two area source categories: industrial boilers and commercial and institutional boilers. Emission standards for control of mercury emissions from coal-fired area source boilers and polycyclic organic matter emissions from all area source boilers would be based on the maximum achievable control technology (MACT). Mercury controls from other boilers, plus controls for additional hazardous air pollutants, would be based on generally available control technology or management practices. The rule also clarified that gas-fired area source boilers would not have to meet the 90-percent requirement of section 112(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act. Existing area source facilities with an affected boiler with a designed heat input capacity of 10 million Btu per hour or greater would need to undergo an energy assessment on the boiler system to identify cost-effective energy conservation measures.

"After receiving additional data through the extensive public comment period, EPA is requesting more time to develop these important rules," said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Air and Radiation. "We want to ensure these rules are practical to implement and protect all Americans from dangerous pollutants such as mercury and soot, which affect kids' development, aggravate asthma and cause heart attacks."

The key hang-up, according to the agency, was in how it categorizes various boiler types; industry representatives offered enlightening information to this regard, according to the EPA, and it's going to take some time to get its categories right for the over 200,000 boilers operation in the United States.

SOURCE: EPA press release.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

Seth is the publisher of Pollution Engineering. Since joining in 2003, he has served as PE’s products editor, associate editor, news editor, e-newsletter editor, website director, and associate publisher, before assuming the reigns of the magazine in April, 2010.

Recent Articles by Seth Fisher

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn