General Industry News

Coal Ash Control Correction

On June 21, 2010, the EPA proposed to regulate the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCRs) generated from the combustion of coal at electric utilities and by independent power producers. In a Federal Register notice on Thursday, Aug. 19, 2010, the agency proposed several administrative corrections in the preamble to the proposed rule, noting that additional support documents are available for public inspection in the rulemaking docket.

Under the first proposal, the EPA reversed its August 1993 and May 2000 Bevill regulatory determinations regarding CCRs, rather listing fly ash as a special waste subject to regulation under subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), when they are destined for disposal in landfills and surface impoundments. Under the second proposal, the agency would rather eave the Bevill Regulatory Determinations in place, and regulate the disposal of such materials under subtitle D of RCRA by issuing national minimum criteria.

The agency also produced a table comparing the two options, which is reproduced below:

Key Differences Between Subtitle C and Subtitle D Options

SUBTITLE C SUBTITLE D
Effective Date Timing will vary from state to state, as each state must adopt the rule individually-can take 1 – 2 years or more Six months after final rule is promulgated for most provision: certain provisions have a longer effective date
Enforcement State and Federal enforcement Enforcement through citizen suits; States can act as citizens.
Corrective Action Monitored by authorized States and EPA Self-implementing
Financial Assurance Yes Considering subsequent rule using CERCLA 108 (b) Authority
Permit Issuance Federal requirement for permit issuance by States No
Requirements for Storage, Including Containers, Tanks, and Containment Buildings Yes No
Surface Impoundments Built Before Rule is Finalized Remove solids and meet land disposal restrictions; retrofit with a liner within five years of effective date. Would effectively phase out use of existing surface impoundments Must remove solids and retrofit with a composite liner or cease receiving CCRs within 5 years of effective date and close the unit
Surface Impoundments Built After Rule is Finalized Must meet Land Disposal Restrictions and liner requirements. Would effectively phase out use of new surface impoundments. Must install composite liners. No Land Disposal Restrictions
Landfills Built Before Rule is Finalized No liner requirements, but require groundwater monitoring No liner requirements, but require groundwater monitoring
Landfills Built After Rule is Finalized Liner requirements and groundwater monitoring Liner requirements and groundwater monitoring
Requirements for Closure and Post-Closure Care Yes; monitored by States and EPA Yes; self-implementing
Both alternatives are under consideration, and under both alternatives, the May 2000 regulatory determination will remain for recycled or "beneficial-use" CCRs, which are currently exempt from the hazardous waste regulations under Section 3001(b)(3)(A) of RCRA.

The agency also extended the deadline for commenting on the fly ash rule to Nov. 19, 2010, and scheduled two additional public hearings.

Read the proposed rule: www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/ccr-rule/index.htm

SOURCE: Federal Register notice.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

Seth is the publisher of Pollution Engineering. Since joining in 2003, he has served as PE’s products editor, associate editor, news editor, e-newsletter editor, website director, and associate publisher, before assuming the reigns of the magazine in April, 2010.

Recent Articles by Seth Fisher

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers.

Included are some of the impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates and different bases to raise aquifer pH.

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead, R&D, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn