General Industry News

EPA Settles With Coal Plant on Violations

New Source Review (NSR) violations at power utilities became a notably rare occurrence in the 2000s, following EPA decisions to raise the NSR trigger point and also dismiss a number of cases until-then pursued against violators. Those cases took years to come even close to settlement. On Friday, July 23, 2010, the EPA and Justice Department announced a new settlement for violations that took place as recent as 2008.

The EPA, the Justice Department, and the state of Indiana announced that Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative Inc. had agreed to pay a civil penalty of $950,000 and install and upgrade pollution control technology at its two coal-fired power plants in Indiana to resolve violations of the Clean Air Act's NSR provisions. The company also will be required to spend $5 million on environmental projects.

The agency issued a notice of violation to The company, an Indiana electric generation and transmission cooperative, alleging that in 2008 it made modifications at its Merom coal-fired power plant without first complying with NSR requirements, including obtaining pre-construction permits and limiting emissions based upon best available control technology (BACT).

"The Justice Department is committed to vigorously enforcing our nation's environmental laws, and we are pleased that Hoosier has agreed to install state-of-the art controls that will significantly reduce harmful emissions," said Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division.

Emissions of SO2 will be reduced by approximately 20,000 tons and NOx by more than 1,800 tons. The settlement will also reduce harmful sulfuric acid mist and particulate matter emissions. To achieve these reductions, the company has agreed to upgrade existing, and install new, pollution controls at the Merom plant, install new pollution controls at the Ratts plant, and comply with annual tonnage limitations across its system. The company estimates that it will spend between $250 and $300 million upgrading and installing pollution controls at its coal-fired units through the end of 2015.

The company will also spend $5 million on environmental mitigation projects in its service territory to address the impacts of past emissions. Of that, $4.8 million will be spent on one or more of the following projects:
  • Coal Bed Methane: The company will capture and combust methane from coal beds to generate at least 10 megawatts of electricity. CO2 emissions resulting from the combustion of methane will be supplied to a greenhouse for use as a fertilizer.
  • Wood Appliance Change-out and Retrofits: The company will sponsor a wood-burning appliance change-out and retrofit project. The company will provide incentives through rebates, discounts and in some instances, replacement of old, inefficient, high polluting wood-burning technology.
  • Clean Diesel Retrofits: The company will retrofit in-service, public diesel engines with emission control equipment designed to reduce air pollutants.
  • Solar Technologies: The company will install solar power systems on public schools or on buildings housing non-profit groups in the company's service territory.
The settlement is just the 20th under the EPA's national enforcement initiative to reduce emissions from coal-fired power plants under the Clean Air Act's New Source Review requirements.

The proposed settlement was lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and is subject to a 30-day public comment period and final court approval.

More information is available at www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/hoosier.html.

SOURCE: EPA/DOJ Press release

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

Seth is the publisher of Pollution Engineering. Since joining in 2003, he has served as PE’s products editor, associate editor, news editor, e-newsletter editor, website director, and associate publisher, before assuming the reigns of the magazine in April, 2010.

Recent Articles by Seth Fisher

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn