General Industry News

Data Available for Coal Ash Commentary

The EPA in the Thursday, Oct. 21, 2010 Federal Register noted it has published further information and data in the docket for the agency's proposed rule concerning the disposal of coal combustion residuals, or coal ash, from electric utilities. The agency is seeking public comment on how, if at all, this additional information should affect the agency's decisions as it develops a final rule.

The info includes a copy of responses to information collection requests that agency sent to electric utilities on their coal combustion residual surface impoundments, as well as reports and materials related to the site assessments that the EPA has conducted on a subset of these impoundments.

After the failure of the coal combustion residual (CCR) surface impoundment at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston facility in December 2008, the EPA undertook an effort to assess the structural integrity of the other CCR surface impoundments. This effort had three components: (1) An information collection request (ICR) that was sent to facilities known to have surface impoundments or similar management units asking for specific information on the structural stability of those units; (2) on-site assessments of the structural integrity of these units; and (3) reports and recommendations for actions at the facility.

The ICRs were sent out in March, April and December of 2009 to electric utilities that have surface impoundments or similar management units that contain CCRs. The ICRs were posted when they were sent, so some have been online for some time.

This totaled 228 facilities and 629 surface impoundments and similar management units. The hazard potential ratings do not assess the stability of these units; rather, the ratings assess the potential for loss of life or environmental and economic damage. Units rated as having a "High" potential hazard are those where failure will probably cause loss of life.

Of the 629 units, 200 (32 percent) have been given a hazard potential rating using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Inventory of Dams criteria. Of those, 50 units (25 percent) are rated as having a High hazard potential; 71 units (36 percent) are rated as having a Significant, and 71 units (36 percent) are rated as having a Low hazard potential; eight units (4 percent) are rated as having a less than low hazard potential.

The EPA is still in the process of completing these assessments; however, the agency is placing the data that are currently available in the docket for the rulemaking, and is soliciting public comment on these data in connection with this rulemaking.

DATES: Submit comments on or before November 19, 2010.

SOURCE: Federal Register

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

Seth is the publisher of Pollution Engineering. Since joining in 2003, he has served as PE’s products editor, associate editor, news editor, e-newsletter editor, website director, and associate publisher, before assuming the reigns of the magazine in April, 2010.

Recent Articles by Seth Fisher

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers.

Included are some of the impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates and different bases to raise aquifer pH.

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead, R&D, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

June 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 June

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

XL Pipeline

The Sec. of State is expected to decide if he should approve the XL Pipeline. Should he approve it?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn