General Industry News

Breathe Easy: BP Burn Wasn't So Bad

Reports from BP disaster find levels of dioxins created during controlled burns were below levels of concern

The EPA on Monday, Nov. 15, 2010, released two peer reviewed reports concerning dioxins emitted during the controlled burns of oil during the Deepwater Horizon BP spill. The reports found that while small amounts of dioxins were created by the burns, the levels that workers and residents would have been exposed to were below the EPA's levels of concern. The massive burn and positive results demonstrate that burning may be a viable option in a future disaster.

Controlled burning of oil on the surface of the ocean (also called in situ burning) was one method used by the Unified Command during the Deepwater Horizon BP oil spill, to reduce the spread of oil and environmental impacts at the shoreline. A total of 411 controlled burn events occurred of which 410 could be quantified, resulting in the combustion of an estimated 222,000 to 313,000 barrels of oil (or 9.3 to 13.1 million gallons).

With support from the U.S. Coast Guard, the EPA conducted sampling of emissions at the source of the controlled burns in the Gulf of Mexico to determine if dioxins were present. The sampling was conducted to identify potential dioxin exposures and determine the potential risks from inhalation to workers in the vicinity of the fires, risks from inhalation to the general population and risks to the general population from consuming fish caught in the area.

The first report summarizing the EPA's sampling effort indicates that while dioxins were created from the burning of oil on ocean water, they were created at low levels – levels similar to the emissions from residential woodstoves and forest fires.

The second report, co-authored with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), presents the results of a screening risk assessment for the dioxins emitted from the controlled oil burns. The results indicate that increased cancer risk due to exposure to the dioxins released from the controlled burning of oil was small - less than a 1 in a million increased cancer risk. Additional cancer risks for inhalation by workers and onshore residents and fish consumption by residents were lower than risk levels that typically are of concern to the agency. Typically, the agency has a concern when the risk is greater than 1 in a million.

Had the spill of oil continued, the results of these measurements would have been used by the Unified Command to determine if burning should continue. However, the well was capped on July 15, 2010 and the last in situ burn occurred on July 19, 2010.  Consequently, these results are most useful to inform and improve the agency's ability to respond to future oil spills.

SOURCE: EPA's website

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

Seth is the publisher of Pollution Engineering. Since joining in 2003, he has served as PE’s products editor, associate editor, news editor, e-newsletter editor, website director, and associate publisher, before assuming the reigns of the magazine in April, 2010.

Recent Articles by Seth Fisher

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn