General Industry News

Study: Funding woes slow toxic site cleanups



Reduced funding for the federal Superfund toxic waste cleanup program has slowed down or halted cleanup at 55 sites, leaving surrounding communities exposed to dangerous toxic waste and letting polluters off the hook, according to an analysis of an EPA inspector general's report.

"As the trust fund diminishes, more and more money for toxic cleanup must be taken from general taxpayer revenues," said Julie Wolk, an environmental health advocate for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), an alliance of state-based, citizen-funded public interest organizations that conducted the analysis. The report blames the Bush administration for cuts to the Superfund budget and Congress for shifting the cleanup burden to taxpayers.

Currently, 1,238 toxic waste sites are listed for cleanup, and 23 to 49 new sites are expected be added each year. From the mid-to late 1990s, Superfund cleaned up an average of 86 sites a year. The EPA estimated it would clean up 65 sites in 2002, but, according to PIRG, the agency completed cleanup at only 47. So far this year, the EPA has cleaned up 42 sites.

But in July, the EPA announced it had enough money this year to start 11 new projects in nine states, with no slowdown anticipated for ongoing work. The agency acknowledged that its ability to start cleanups at new sites is "more constrained today than in the past" but that both EPA's cleanup budget and the cleanup funds contributed by responsible parties have remained fairly constant.

PIRG's analysis contends that annual Superfund appropriations from 2001 to 2003 are more than $1 billion less than program needs. Call PIRG's Wolk at (202) 546-9707. For information from the EPA, visit www.epa.gov/superfund.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Pollution Engineering Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

WEFTEC 2006

WEFTEC®, the Water Environment Federation’s Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, is the biggest meeting of its kind in North America and offers thousands of water quality professionals from around the world the best water quality education and training available today.

Podcasts

This podcast addresses solutions to problems that can affect bioremediation in acidic aquifers, such as:

  • Impacts of pH on reductive dechlorination rates
  • Different bases to raise aquifer pH

Speaker- Dr. Stephen Richardson, P.E., Technical Lead for Research and Development, EOS Remediation

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Pollution Engineering

May 2013 PE cover 100px

2013 May

Check out the latest edition of Pollution Engineering Magazine today!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

EPA emissions legislation

Industry & states petitioned the Supreme Court to review EPA’s GHG emissions for power plants and cars. Do you think the court will deny the petition?
View Results Poll Archive

THE POLLUTION ENGINNERING STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\PE\toward-zero-discharge.gif
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution: Concepts and Engineering

Presents the practical work of leading experts working with highly impacted areas across the world.

More Products

Editor's Choice Awards

2013 PE Editors ChoicePollution Engineering magazine will be choosing the top, most innovative products and presenting companies that are chosen with an Editor's Choice Awards. The announcement will be published in the July 2013 issue. Visit the editor's choice awards page today!

PE Digital Editions

1112PE_Cover.jpgView Pollution Engineering's popular digital editions with interactive features. To receive each digital issue as soon as it’s available and delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe now!

STAY CONNECTED

FacebookTwitterYoutubeLinkedIn