The EPA on Thursday, July 29, 2010, denied 10 petitions
challenging its 2009 determination that climate change is real, is occurring
due to emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities, and threatens human
health and the environment.
The petitions to reconsider the EPA's Endangerment Finding
claimed that climate science cannot be trusted, and asserted a conspiracy that
invalidates the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and the U.S. Global Change
Research Program. After months of serious consideration of the petitions and of
the state of climate change science, the EPA said it found no evidence to
support these claims. In contrast, the EPA's review shows that climate science
is credible, compelling and growing stronger.
"The endangerment finding is based on years of science
from the U.S. and around the world. These petitions -- based as they are on
selectively edited, out-of-context data and a manufactured controversy --
provide no evidence to undermine our determination. Excess greenhouse gases are
a threat to our health and welfare," said EPA Administrator Lisa P.
Jackson. "Defenders of the status quo will try to slow our efforts to get
America running on clean energy. A better solution would be to join the vast
majority of the American people who want to see more green jobs, more clean
energy innovation and an end to the oil addiction that pollutes our planet and
jeopardizes our national security."
The agency provided candid responses to petitioners' main
points. In the agency's words:
Claim: Petitioners say that e-mails
disclosed from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit provide
evidence of a conspiracy to manipulate global temperature data.
EPA Response: EPA reviewed every e-mail
and found this was simply a candid discussion of scientists working through
issues that arise in compiling and presenting large complex data sets. Four
other independent reviews came to similar conclusions.
Claim: Petitioners say that errors in the
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report call the entire body of work into question.
EPA Response: Of the alleged errors, EPA
confirmed only two in a 3,000 page report. The first pertains to the rate of
Himalayan glacier melt and second to the percentage of the Netherlands below
sea level. IPCC issued correction statements for both of these errors. The
errors have no bearing on Administrator Jackson's decision. None of the errors
undermines the basic facts that the climate is changing in ways that threaten
our health and welfare.
Claim: Petitioners say that because
certain studies were not included in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, the
IPCC itself is biased and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable
information.
EPA Response: These claims are incorrect.
In fact, the studies in question were included in the IPCC report, which
provided a comprehensive and balanced discussion of climate science.
Claim: Petitioners say that new
scientific studies refute evidence supporting the Endangerment Finding.
Response: Petitioners misinterpreted the
results of these studies. Contrary to their claims, many of the papers they
submit as evidence are consistent with EPA's Finding. Other studies submitted
by the petitioners were based on unsound methodologies. Detailed discussion of
these issues may be found in volume one of the response to petition documents,
on EPA's website.
Climate change is already happening, and human activity is a
contributor. The global warming trend over the past 100 years is confirmed by
three separate records of surface temperature, all of which are confirmed by
satellite data. Beyond this, evidence of climate change is seen in melting ice
in the Arctic, melting glaciers around the world, increasing ocean
temperatures, rising sea levels, shifting precipitation patterns, and changing
ecosystems and wildlife habitats.
The agency said it believes
America's Climate
Choices, a report from the National Academy of Sciences and
the most recent assessment of the full body of scientific literature on climate
change, along with the recently released
State
of the Climate report from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration both fully support the conclusion that climate
change is real and poses significant risk to human and natural systems. The
agency said the consistency among these and previously issued assessments
serves to strengthen the agency's conclusion.
Information on the EPA's findings and the petitions is
available at
http://epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment/petitions.html
SOURCE: EPA press release