Pollution Engineering Magazine
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  White Papers
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Career Center
  Resource Guide
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  PE Info
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  About
  Online
  PE Coffeehaus
  PE Partner Blogs
  eNewsletters
  Calendar
  ePE-TV
  Webinars
  Podcast
  PE Learning Center
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
EPA Reconsiders Fracking
by Roy Bigham
July 21, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The EPA announced that it is re-evaluating potential dangers caused by fracking. Conservation groups are complaining that the drilling industry has lost credibility and that their practices need to be better regulated.

Geologists have discovered a vast underground area in the Northeast that holds natural gas. The area is dubbed it the Marcellus Shale region. The dense rock formation lies within the borders of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and Ohio. It is estimated that the formation holds enough gas to supply the entire East Coast region for at least the next 50 years. Natural gas is considered a clean alternative energy source.

To free the gas resource, drillers employ a technique of fracturing the rock formations. This technique has been practiced for over 60 years and is called “fracking” in the industry. According to Lee Fuller, director of the industry coalition, Energy in Depth, multiple studies have consistently shown that the risks are well managed and the process is safe. In fact, six years ago, the EPA declared that fracking posed very little threat to underground sources of drinking water. Just one year later, the Congress exempted the practice from regulation.

However, mostly due to the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, conservation groups are demanding that it be studied again. They are lobbying to place a moratorium on fracking the Marcellus Shale formation in order to protect the groundwater.

Congress has asked the EPA to re-examine previous studies as they want to respond to allegations that the 2004 study conclusion was not scientifically supported and it was politically tainted. According to the EPA website (www.epa.gov/safewater/uic/wells_hydrofrac.html), the agency agrees with Congress that there are serious concerns. One of the major concerns is the potential release of radon, a recognized cancer-causing chemical. Money has been set aside and studies will be conducted for the next few years. They expect to be able to release results by 2012.


Roy Bigham
roy@pollutionengineering.com
Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.











BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy