Ten Top Technologies for 2010
by Seth Fisher
January 1, 2010
It is that time of year again as the PE staff takes a look at new technologies that could impact our environment.
Prediction: Some time this year, people will stop referring
to the year as "two-thousand-"something and start calling it "twenty-."
Prediction 2: That will not be the only thing that changes.
In 1899, Charles H. Duell, Commissioner of the U.S. Patent
Office, wrote a letter to President McKinley stating that everything that can
be invented already had been. The sentiment was predicated on the unprecedented
technology leap that had occurred in the 19th century, and the apparent slowing
down of innovation. By 1920, that sentiment looked pretty silly. A century
later, it seems ludicrous.
Yet a hundred years after progress supposedly died on the
eve of the Progressive Era, again a sense has crept into the American public
that all of the big discoveries have been made, that our biggest technological
dreams will be forever 40 years away, that companies have forgone R&D and
are focused solely on survival.
It would be equally untrue.
It has been said that the environmental market is driven by
regulations, which is true, but not the whole story. Congress and the White
House could create all the regulations in the world, and it would do little for
the environment without the technological advances required to achieve those
goals.
Some of the following technologies that will hit
the market or be developed this year are directed at meeting upcoming
regulatory challenges, particularly greenhouse gas (GHG) control. For many of
these advances, however, improving current environmental practices was impetus
enough. Some are ready to hit the market, or have already, while others are
still far from complete realization. All of them started simply as ideas and
now march toward practical application. They are not the absolute top ten –
such a list would be impossible to create with any honesty. But they are all
good examples of what is likely to be accomplished as the environmental
industry enters the "Twenty-Teens."
10. Cleaner-burning gasoline
The
biggest problem – pollution-wise – with gasoline is not that it generates a lot
of CO2 when burned, but that its refining process
generates more dire pollutants, and also leaves some of those pollutants in the
final product, reducing fuel efficiency and contributing to air pollution.
Researchers at Wayne State University in Detroit are testing the potential of
metal phosphides as catalysts in the refining process. Their goal is to remove
more sulfur from crude oil than is possible with current methods. If
successful, the research could lead to gasoline that releases lower quantities
of SO2 and NOX. Since those
pollutants cannot be controlled at the tailpipe, reducing their presence in
fuel could go a long way toward helping the U.S. meet EPA mandates for lower
emissions of both gases.
9. Hydrogeologic simulation
Controlling water pollution is not easy, since wastewater tends to find all sorts of interesting ways of trickling into things it shouldn't. More precise (and less expensive) modeling of groundwater flows could be a major step toward easing the wastewater burden for some companies, and on the flip side, noticing unforeseen dangers. Schlumberger Water Services of Waterloo, Ontario, recently launched its simulator-independent conceptual modeling environmental software, which the company calls Hydro Geobuilder. Compatible with U.S. Geological Services' Visual Modflow modeling code, the software can build and evaluate groundwater flow models independently from the grid or mesh. It cannot replace numerical models yet, but it can give a valuable second opinion. Who knows: maybe one day calculating groundwater flows may be as simple as inputting GIS data.
8. New ingredients for fusion: ice, coconuts, very big laser
Major advancements have been made in fusion science and in
the next decade, could see another big leap. In France, ITER, the International
Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, will go online in 2018. The reactor, which
should reach 150 million Kelvin (the sun's core is about 15 million Kelvin),
comes with a galactic-strength cooling system, and a cleaning system that uses
coconut charcoal as its super-adsorbent. Edge localization modes (ELMs –
basically miniature solar flares) possibly could be controlled by regularly
spitting ice pellets (of frozen deuterium) at the plasma.
Meanwhile, the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory in California, along with affiliated labs such as
the home of nukes in Los Alamos, say they are a $3.5 billion laser away from
fusion ignition. The laser smash theory for creating controlled fusion has been
around for a long time, but until the Californians came along, a laser of the
required size had only been imagined, not designed.
7. Energy from biosolids
Qteros of Marlborough, Mass., and Israeli company Applied CleanTech have commercialized a process that the companies say can turn biomass such as municipal biosolids into cellulosic ethanol. The system uses biosolids (called Recyllose) produced from the Israeli process. The process is particularly useful for ethanol production because it ends up with a low-lignin sludge. The companies estimate that one ton of biosolids could produce 120 to 135 gallons of ethanol. Using those numbers, and guessing about 30 million gallons per year of ethanol would be required to achieve profitability, the system could likely be cost-efficient for any municipal wastewater treatment plant that produces over a 250,000 tons of sludge per year (about a 200 MGD plant). Visit www.qteros.com and www.appliedcleantech.com for more information.
6. Running on waste
Meanwhile, Moinuddin Sarker, Ph.D., MCIC, and vice president
of Research & Development for Natural State Research Inc., Stamford, Conn.,
has discovered a formula to make liquid fuel from waste plastic. In the
conversion process, almost 100 percent of the plastics turned into liquid fuel
for any internal combustion engines. The company is looking for a partner to
franchise its technology. For more information about the project, contact
Sarker at msarker@naturalstateresearch.com, or visit
www.naturalstateresearch.com.
And in Napa Valley, they may not be able to turn
water into wine, but researchers visiting from Pennsylvania State University in
State College are already turning wine wastewater into hydrogen fuel. A
refrigerator-sized generator takes waste from the Napa Wine Company in
Oakville, Calif., and feeds it to microbes. With the aid of a little
electricity, these naturally occurring bacteria break the organic material to
release hydrogen gas. While the generator is still being tweaked, and has not
yet reached its goal of one liter of hydrogen per liter of reactor, Penn State
environmental engineer Bruce Logan believes the winery eventually could use the
hydrogen to run its vehicles and power systems.
5. A fine mesh to be in
The EPA is considering a technology requirement to retrofit
fine-mesh (2.0 millimeter) screens at all applicable facilities as a central
feature of a revised Phase II Rule. There are numerous U.S. power plants
operating with fine-mesh screens but none is located along waterways with heavy
sediment and debris loads commonly found in Midwestern rivers, particularly the
Missouri River and its tributaries.
Last September, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
announced that it has secured a test site (Kansas City's Hawthorn Station) to
evaluate fine-mesh screen performance on power plant cooling water intake structures.
The screens are a key technology that the EPA is considering as a way to
protect fish and other species living near the structures.
The testing is part of a new research project to
evaluate fine-mesh screen performance in sediment and debris-laden rivers. Data
generated from the fine-mesh screen testing is expected to provide critically
important information to the EPA to revise the Clean Water Act §316(b) Phase II
Rule. The rule may require the use of screening technologies for fish and
shellfish protection on cooling water intake structures, and would apply to
power plants using once-through cooling at more than 50 million MGD of water. A
new draft version for public review and comment is expected in mid-2010.
4. Algae-braic, my Dear Watson
One of nature's favorite energy sources may be the key to
human energy needs. A book by Mark Edwards of Arizona State University in
Tempe, entitled Green Algae Strategy: End Oil Imports and Engineer Sustainable
Food and Fuel, outlines how that might be accomplished. In the report, which
won the 2009 Gold Independent Book Publishers' Award in Science, Edwards
explored possible uses for various types of algae in a number of environmental
endeavors.
Isaac Berzin, founder of GreenFuel Technologies Corp., wants
to put an algae farm beside every power plant. In a recent podcast with the
blog Algae to Oil, Berzin noted that the resources needed to harness algae are
exactly those that fossil fuel-burning power plants have in abundance: land
that nobody wants to live on, non-potable water and lots of CO2.
The key to the effectiveness of this most ancient plant is
actually its incredible inefficiency. Compared to other extant photosynthetic
organisms today, algae is a more effective CO2 scrubber
and energy source because its evolutionary simplicity never gave it the energy
economy of more advanced organisms. Algae thus use more air and stores more
photosynthetic energy than terrestrial grains. Possible uses in wastewater are
also being developed; since algae is a fairly indiscriminant devourer of
nutrients, it can thrive in polluted environments, and treat a lot wastewater
streams.
Not all algae are good; fighting toxic
blue-green algae formations is a major concern for ocean and inland water
professionals. At the Society for General Microbiology's meeting at Herot-Watt
University in Edinburgh, researchers from Scotland's Robert Gordon University
noted they had identified more than 10 strains of bacteria that can break
microcystins down into harmless byproducts. Six of the strains were tested with
contaminated river water under conditions that simulated real-world conditions,
and all six were able to break down the toxins, the researchers reported.
3. Circuits of slime
Genetic analysts at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta,
working with teams from Michigan State University in East Lansing, and Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Wash., have noticed that bacteria
strains that are effective at cleaning up pollutants are usually made up of
several different types of germs. Researchers have been looking into mixing and
matching certain known effective microbes to obtain different effects, from
cleaning nuclear dumpsites to powering future fuel cells, to lighting.
"Soon we will be able to pick the right strain for
cleaning specific environments," said Kostas Konstantinidis, an
environmental microbiologist at Georgia Tech. "But we are in the beginning
stages of this."
Konstantinidis and his colleagues focused on a bacterial
genus known as Shewanella, which is found in a wide spectrum of ecosystems
ranging from the Arctic to the Amazon. Their genetic analysis of 10 strains of
Shewanella was published late last year in the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.
Shewanella typically converts metals and other nasty
compounds into less toxic stuff, which makes the bacteria well-suited for
environmental cleanup duty. One strain of the bacteria, Shewanella oneidensis
MR-1, is particularly good at sucking metal oxides from groundwater and
transforming them into insoluble forms that are ripe for removal. The U.S
Department of Energy is looking into whether that strain could help clean up
radioactive nuclear weapons sites.
Shewanella is also being studied as a potential
power converter for microbial fuel cells. In that application, Shewanella (or
other microbes such as Geobacter) would gobble up metals and expel electrons as
a waste product, setting up what Konstantinidis called "circuits of slime."
2. Nanowires, or bacteria?
Derek Loveley, a professor at the University of
Massachusetts at Amherst, is also looking into power-conducting scum. He
discovered that tiny filaments appear to enhance the flow of electricity by a
strain of sulfur-eating bacteria known as Geobacter sulfurreducens KN400.
"The filaments form microscopic projections called pili
that act as microbial nanowires," Lovley said in a news release. "Using
this bacterial strain in a fuel cell to generate electricity would greatly
increase the cell's power output."
Lovley and his colleagues are developing such
fuel cells to power monitoring devices in environments where it's difficult to
replace batteries. KN400, for example, could provide the energy for deep-sea
sensors that monitor turtle migration, Lovley said.
1. It's just carbon and oxygen
CO2 is an excellent example of two good components that are less desirable when paired. As a waste gas, pure oxygen as is the next-cleanest thing to nitrogen; at 20 percent of the Earth's atmosphere (as opposed to CO2, which is less than 0.04 percent), the amount of O2 that can be released into the atmosphere is, in human terms, limitless. Meanwhile, graphite, a simple carbon allotrope, is a valuable substance to have around (as is another well-known carbon allotrope that has been described as an entire gender's "best friend"). So if (when) CO2 becomes a controlled "pollutant," the ability to break it down into its two stable components would be nice.
What is stopping this from happening is the CO2 bond is strong, so it should take much more energy that it is worth to separate the two, unless the bond can be weakened first.
Integrated Environmental Services Inc., Lake Forest, Calif., has found a way to pre-process CO2 so that its molecular bonds can be broken with only a third of the bond energy (somewhat like a crude oil refinery uses catalytic devices to reduce the energy needed to refine crude oil). The company notes that the cost of the technology for the facility will depend upon the facility characteristics. The process also reduces other pollutants in the stream, so at new power plants, a simultaneous CO2, NOX and SO2 emission system could be installed; for plants that already have NOX and SO2 controls, the cost justification is a bit more dicey. The company is in the process of selecting a facility in the United States for a large-scale demonstration project. PE
|