Legal Lookout: REACHing the Montebello Agreement
by Lynn L. Bergeson
January 8, 2008
A look at the recent agreement on industrial
chemical controls, and what it could mean for industry.
In August, EPA, Canada and Mexico announced in
Montebello, Quebec, new efforts to ensure the safe manufacture and use of
industrial chemicals by entering into a regional partnership for assessing and
managing potential chemical risks. As part of what is now referred to as the
"Montebello Agreement" made at the Security and Prosperity Partnership
(SPP) of North America Leaders' Summit, these countries agreed to coordinate
efforts to assess approximately 9,000 industrial chemicals that are produced or
imported in volumes above 25,000 pounds per year.
The agreement
Under the agreement, the countries agreed to certain
milestones. By 2012, the United States is to complete risk characterizations
and initiate needed action on the more than 9,000 existing chemicals produced
in the country in quantities above 25,000 pounds per year. The Moderate
Production Volume (MPV) Program, as it has come to be called, is patterned
after the HPV Challenge Program, and will build upon the success of that
program and the CCMP. Canada is to complete assessments and take regulatory
action on the Canadian highest priority substances and initiate assessments of
medium priority substances. Mexico is to develop an information system for
dangerous materials. All three countries are to enhance appropriate
coordination in areas including testing, research, information gathering,
assessment and risk management actions.
By 2020, the agreement commits all parties to develop and/or update inventories
of chemicals in commerce. Mexico is to have enhanced its capacity to assess and
manage chemicals. All three countries are to achieve the sound chemical
management in North America consistent with the World Summit on Sustainable
Development Johannesburg Plan of Implementation, and reinforced under the
Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management.
Data generated under the agreement are intended to be used in jurisdictions
outside of North America. For example, data generated in the HPV and MPV
programs are expected to be useful in meeting REACH registration requirements.
Implications
The Montebello Agreement is thought by some as the North
American response to REACH, the European Union's Registration, Evaluation,
Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals program. In a briefing paper dated
Oct. 30, 2007, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association stated, "The
Montebello Agreement provides a unique opportunity to affect the future of
chemicals management policy both here and abroad. It is the only regional model
that is truly tiered, targeted and risk-based … It is in the best interest of
U.S. industry to support the Montebello Agreement and work with authorities in
North America to ensure its success."
But environmental groups believe that REACH is the appropriate model on which
to base domestic chemical management policy, not voluntary efforts such as those
contemplated under the agreement, the HPV Challenge Program, or similar
chemical initiatives.
Chemical manufacturers and users are urged to be mindful of the agreement,
support its goals and monitor chemical management polices in the U.S. as they
evolve. With elections fast approaching, it is unclear whether the REACH model,
the approach envisioned in the Montebello Agreement, or some other approach
ultimately will prevail as the model of choice for domestic decision-makers in
chemical management policy. PE
|