Pollution Engineering Magazine
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  White Papers
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Career Center
  Resource Guide
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  PE Info
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  About
  Online
  PE Coffeehaus
  PE Partner Blogs
  eNewsletters
  Calendar
  ePE-TV
  Webinars
  Podcast
  PE Learning Center
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Who’s Holding the Purse Strings
by Roy Bigham
August 31, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

A new trend in bank loaning makes one wonder what is going on behind the large oak doors on the top floor at those institutions.


There is a new trend happening at banks that make major business loans. Companies should be aware as they look to their future.

Major companies often borrow money from banks to keep their businesses running smoothly. They use that money to develop resources. The money is paid back after the resources are marketed. This method of doing business has been common practice for a very long time.

However, there appears to be a change in the larger banks according to a report in the New York Times on Aug 30, 2010. Banks are beginning to turn businesses down if they operate processes that might appear to be environmentally risky in any way. For example, Wells Fargo announced they would be limiting and reducing their involvement in businesses that draw “considerable attention and controversy” such as mountaintop mining. Other major banks such as HSBC have withdrawn support for some companies involved in producing palm oil are making similar decisions. Environmentalists have complained that the production of palm oil leads to deforestation.

The reports did not say that regulators were putting any pressure on these banks. However, it does appear strange that they would walk away from operations that have been so profitable to them and the companies are not doing anything that is illegal.

Some experts speculate that this is just a natural progression as banks work to reduce any risk or loss of reputation if they work with a company with a bad environmental track record. While Congress did limit a bank’s liability with legislation passed in 1996, they continued to develop stricter environmental guidelines. It appears that they are now pulling their heads deeper into their shells now.

This may just be an opportunity for the smaller banks to step up or private capital investor groups could improve their returns by picking up this market. We may be witnessing a change in who is handling the purse strings. Whether that is a good or bad thing is yet to be determined.


Roy Bigham
roy@pollutionengineering.com
Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.











BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy