Pollution Engineering Magazine
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  White Papers
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Career Center
  Resource Guide
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  PE Info
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  About
  Online
  PE Coffeehaus
  PE Partner Blogs
  eNewsletters
  Calendar
  ePE-TV
  Webinars
  Podcast
  PE Learning Center
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
The Lowly Worm Earns No Respect
by Roy Bigham
June 16, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Most engineers have run into or know someone who has had a problem with a project due to the Endangered Species Act. The giant Palouse earthworm will not be one of those species as of this week..

The Palouse was first noted in 1897 in scientific journals. The worm was named after the area where it was originally discovered, the Palouse Prairie, which is a large area bordering Washington and Idaho. It had been reported that the worm grew to over 3 feet in length and could spit and smelled like lilies.

The prairie area was rapidly settled and developed in the early 1900s into an agricultural area due to the rich soils that were deposited from the Ice Age. The farming activity appeared to eliminate the giant earthworm as sightings became fewer and fewer. No worms have been spotted for decades.

In 2005, a graduate student from Idaho was collecting soil samples near Albion when she noticed a huge worm in her shovel. Unfortunately, the creature had been cut in half during the excavation activity. Examinations determined it was the supposed extinct Palouse earthworm.

The Center for Biological Diversity out of Portland, Ore., joined with other conservation groups and petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to add the worm to the endangered species list since it had not been found in so long a time. Since then, a few more of the species have been located and captured. It has been determined now that the adult worm only achieves 10 or 12 inches when fully extended. It does not spit nor smell of lilies. After some consideration, a lower court determined that the worm was not sufficiently unique to qualify for the endangered list. This week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court’s findings.

Since the original petition had been filed years ago, environmentalists announced that they plan to refile in order to protect the worm. "We think that under the new administration, that petition will get a better hearing than the last one did," said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program director for the Center for Biological Diversity in Portland, Ore. The conservative groups that originally filed said they would also appeal the 9th Circuit Court’s ruling.

So for now, construction projects can continue without the need to sift each shovel and determine that the worms are not disturbed.


Roy Bigham
roy@pollutionengineering.com
Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.











BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy