Pollution Engineering Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  eNewsletters
  ePE-TV
  Weekly Podcast
  Calendar
  Webinars
  Showrooms
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Products of the Month
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Career Center
  2010 Software Vendor Listing Form
  Resource Guide
  White Papers
  Media Kit
  PE Info
  Special Collections
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Spanish Government Halts Solar Subsidies
by Roy Bigham
September 9, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

While the U.S. pushes on, other countries have already found out that cost is a driving factor for clean energy.


The Spanish government shut down a program to subsidize the cost of installing solar voltaic panels. They once had hopes of being the world leading in solar and wind energy installations. However, the current costs are just to high and the leaders decided it was just too big a risk for the country given the current economic climate.

Spain installed over half the total capacity in solar generation in 2008 as measured in wattage. In late 2008, they tried to reduce the cost impacts by capping the subsidies and in 2009, decided the cost was just too high. The solar market in Spain is collapsing, which will increase supplies in the rest of the world, thus causing market problems all over. Wind energy continues to enjoy a growth in Spain. They are second to the United States in wind power generation. Wind supplies nearly 11 percent of the power in Spain and is still growing. That compares to just 1 percent generated by solar.

The question must be asked as to whether this technology should be pushed upon the public before the costs are competitive with other methods? Are we spending in another area that seems destined to put us even further in the hole?

It is my opinion that this technology is not yet ready for commercial, widespread use. The efficiencies are terrible. The technology to store energy for nights and cloudy days is only in its infancy. Rather than pouring money into installation programs that are nearly certain to become obsolete at best, we should be spending all of the money on research to develop a commercially viable technology. How long will that take? I have no idea. That is why it is called research. You know, search for an answer and re-search until the right answer is found. It is just impossible to know in advance how many roads or trails must be followed until the end is found. I believe that solar and hydrogen generation is our energy future but not by 2012 or even 2020 but it might be!


Roy Bigham
roy@pollutionengineering.com
Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



























BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy