This is a question we used to get at grocery stores. While the question is no longer asked, the concept is still a source of contention in some parts of the country.
The argument continues over what is better to use, plastic or paper bags. Purists will insist that the answer is neither. According to them, we should carry reusable bags. After watching a young bagger struggle to balance the bag while filling it and then have it fall over when placed into the cart, I believe it is likely to spread the contents of the bag in the trunk even more, leaving the hapless consumer having to repack them in order to move the merchandise from the car to the home. A definite disadvantage in the winter in my part of the country.
Paper supporters claim they are saving the environment. Indeed, I saw one paper bag on the Internet that had a commentary printed on it claiming that this bag is made of recycled paper and NO trees were destroyed to make the bag. I guess they just forgot about the original trees that gave up its fibrous content to make an original paper product. It must have sounded like a good idea at the time. Plastic supporters also have a number or reasons that paper is not so good for the environment. First, it requires power and water to manufacture the paper bags. Paper is magnitudes heavier than plastic and therefore requires more energy to deliver paper products than the same number of plastic bags. Paper is more expensive. Paper claims that plastic takes 300 years to break down. Plastic claims that paper breaks down, but emits methane gas while it does. Seems to me paper could also evolve CO2 gas. However, these should be moot points since both are recyclable.
To me, it doesn’t really matter. The exception would be when I need a quick costume for one of the grandkids. I would never use a plastic bag as a mask but paper gives me a lot of possibilities.
Here is what really gets my craw though. Again, it is the politicians that decide they need to tell me how to live my life. Some places have outright banned plastic bag use. Other cities are looking at adding a per bag extra charge. A consumer group is currently battling against Seattle's proposal to charge and extra $0.20 per bag. The city does not want anybody to use paper or plastic and the city fathers believe they know better than their constituents. Other cities are carefully watching the outcome of this fight. If the city wins, you can believe others will leap to quickly increase your tax by calling it a per bag fee.
RoyBigham roy@pollutionengineering.com Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where
he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree
in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research
laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated
analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental
operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major
manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services
department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on
to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction
aggregates company.
Bigham
won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in
the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active
in the environmental field since 1980.
Title: Story Update By: Roy Bigham Posted: August 19, 2009 3:24 PM
The Seattle bag fee was put to the voters on Tuesday, August 18, 2009. With about half the ballots counted by Wednesday, it appears that the per bag fee will fizzle out with 58 percent against and 42 percent for it. Disposable bag makers outspent the lobby for companies that make reusable bags by 15 to 1. However, the losers took solice in the knowledge that they succeeded in raising awarness of the issue.
Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
By: Roy Bigham
Posted: August 19, 2009 3:24 PM