Pollution Engineering Magazine
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  White Papers
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Career Center
  Resource Guide
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  PE Info
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  About
  Online
  PE Coffeehaus
  PE Partner Blogs
  eNewsletters
  Calendar
  ePE-TV
  Webinars
  Podcast
  PE Learning Center
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Congress Rushes to Complete Agendas
by Roy Bigham
April 1, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, fired the first salvo in the rush to place limits on emissions of so-called greenhouse gases. I added the phrase so-called because the people that tout the doom of global warming claim that all scientists agree that it is a problem. However, it takes very little effort to find thousands of respected scientists and meteorologists that take issue with those conclusions.

However, the current flock of congressional leaders does have the power and they will fully utilize their current positions to charge after their agendas. Waxman introduced a bill from his committee that will require that heat-trapping gases be reduced by 20 percent by 2020 and by 80 percent by 2050. The proposed bill would additionally require every region in the U.S. to generate 25 percent of their power from renewable sources such as geothermal, solar and wind. Meanwhile, the EPA is continuing to move on its plan to announce new plans to exert its regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act.

The most interesting part of Waxman’s proposal is what is missing. The trade part of the cap and trade system is expected to generate billions of dollars. What will be done with the money? Will Congress add taxes to keep it? Will energy companies be allowed to keep it for investment to defray the additional costs? Will the money be distributed back to the consumer, who will ultimately see their utility bills increase to cover these additional billions of dollars?

Other requirements in this bill are that more electric vehicles must be produced (more expense), the electrical grid should be modernized (more expense), and buildings and appliances must be improved to use less energy (more expense).

Rather than just being a complainer, I have another idea. The purpose of the bill is supposed to reduce emissions of CO2 gas and our dependency on foreign oil. They could just restrict all imports of oil except from Canada and Mexico. The market would then be free to find the most cost effective solution to meet the increasing public demand. Provide tax breaks for adding alternative energy sources to their mix. Provide tax breaks for those companies that lower their CO2 emissions. The more their lower it, the bigger the tax break. That provides them with incentive to develop sequestration technology and keeps the coal-producing states in business. Also, Congress needs to complete its work on developing standards for a new electricity grid infrastructure but keep that as a separate item. We really don’t want to drag our feet until we get hit with another national blackout. Well, maybe just D.C.


Roy Bigham
roy@pollutionengineering.com
Roy D. Bigham has been the editor of Pollution Engineering since 2002. Bigham attended Eastern Michigan University where he majored in chemistry and computer science with an associates degree in mathematics. He has worked as a laboratory technician at a research laboratory, managed an electroplating operation and an associated analytical laboratory. He spent three years overseeing environmental operations of five domestic and five overseas operations for a major manufacturer in the Detroit area. He then managed a field services department for an environmental analytical laboratory before moving on to a position as an environmental engineer for a construction aggregates company.

Bigham won a design award for a waste water treatment system for a landfill in the Detroit area from the State Chamber of Commerce. He has been active in the environmental field since 1980.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.











BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy