Getting Rid of FOREIGN OIL
by Steve Kahn
March 1, 2009
How to select in-situ injection technologies for remediation of hydrocarbons.
The environmental site assessment and remediation industry
is relatively new and dynamic, and like any new field, innovations are rapidly
altering processes and techniques utilized to achieve site cleanup and closure.
Recently, new methods and innovative technologies, designed to treat
contaminants in-situ via injection of slurry mixtures, are gaining recognition
in the environmental remediation field. The system uses discrete chemical and/or
biologically based injections, as opposed to a permanent infrastructure.
Remediation is accomplished with a direct-push drill rig, injectate, mixing
tanks and pumps. Cleanup can be accomplished in a matter of weeks or months, as
they do not require the same semi-permanent piping infrastructures, equipment
compounds, onsite technicians, utility connections and permits.
One of the most critical factors in successfully installing
an injectate is overcoming delivery challenges, i.e. getting the treatment
reagent to the subsurface impacted area such that adequate contact is made
(between injectate and solute/contaminant) to achieve targeted concentration
reductions. The science behind these technologies is sound, but successful
full-scale implementation beyond the laboratory necessitates a proper
three-dimensional distribution of injectate in the subsurface. In order to
achieve a successful design, a thorough site conceptual model is required
relative to other remediation technologies. Identification of geologic
heterogeneities and a quantitative understanding of the contamination profile
are crucial. A haphazard approach of injecting a variety of injectates without
developing the site conceptual model ultimately will lead to either project
failure by under dosing a site, or cost overruns by overdosing a site, hence
wasting resources.
Environmental remediation injection technologies
fundamentally promote either abiotic chemical reactions, biologically mediated
reactions, or a combination of the two. Following are descriptions of several
chemical and biological injectates and technologies.
Chemical injectates
 |
| Direct push exploration and injection systems can be faster than traditional drilling methods. Also, they can be used in restricted areas such as shown above where the overhead wires would be a problem. |
|
Chemical oxidation: Chemical oxidation is defined as an
abiotic reaction where electrons are transferred from electron donors to electron
acceptors, and in the process the constituents of concern (COCs) undergo
transformation to less harmful end products. Often, a variety of reactions will
occur, sometimes with the intermediary products having equal or worse toxicity
than the original COC. Generally, end products are CO2 gas and water. Various
oxidants can be used to perform the reactions, with most utilizing the
formation of a species called a free radical. Free radicals, or simply
radicals, are unstable species that are highly reactive, which give this
technology the ability to degrade a variety of organic chemicals quickly.
Typical oxidants are permanganate, persulfate, hydrogen peroxide/Fenton's
reagent and ozone. Many proprietary oxidants are also available.
Reductive dechlorination: As with biotic reductive
dechlorination, abiotic reductive dechlorination happens when a chlorine atom
is removed from an organic compound. Abiotic reductive dechlorination is often
accomplished by the addition of zero-valent (elemental) iron (ZVI). ZVI is
typically applied in permeable reactive barriers with funnel and gate systems
to control the flow of the groundwater. This technology degrades chlorinated
organics through an oxidation/reduction reaction where the ZVI is oxidized to
ferrous or ferric iron, as the chlorinated compound is reduced, which removes
the chlorine atoms from the COCs.
Carbon slurry bioremediation/abiotic reductive
dechlorination: This technology utilizes activated carbon that is impregnated
with elemental iron in an injectable slurry that first adsorbs contaminants
in-situ, and then promotes abiotic reductive dechlorination for chlorinated
organics. It is unique in that it immediately reduces observed COC
concentrations, as the activated carbon immobilizes the contamination, while
typical abiotic dechlorination is allowed to proceed within the activated
carbon complex. During this process, groundwater quality is protected through
the cleanup cycle by the activated carbon's adsorptive capabilities.
Biological injectates
 |
| Direct push rigs can penetrate many surfaces including concrete, asphalt or even frozen ground. |
|
Reductive dechlorination: Biotic reductive dechlorination
takes place when a chlorine atom is biologically removed from an organic
compound. This process is utilized to degrade chlorinated organics. Biotic
reductive dechlorination/dehalogenation may be accomplished by introducing a
substrate (electron donor mixture), such as lactate, molasses, acetate or other
non-toxic hydrocarbon. Biotic reductive dechlorination is most often mediated
with hydrogen acting as the electron donor. There are many carbon-based
substrates that can be naturally degraded and fermented in the subsurface that
result in the generation of hydrogen. The substrates most commonly added to
facilitate biotic reductive dechlorination include soluble substrates
(molasses, lactate, acetate), high-viscosity fluid substrates (vegetable oils),
low-viscosity fluid substrates (vegetable oil emulsions), and proprietary
injection products.
Biostimulation: Biostimulation does not involve adding
organisms, but rather simply implies adding nutrients or electron acceptors to
the aquifer to facilitate bioremediation. Most bioremediation technologies can
be classified as biostimulation. Additives are usually introduced to the
subsurface through injection or by gravity feed into an existing well network.
Electron acceptors are often the typical rate-limiting reactant in the
bioremediation process. Biostimulation can be classified as either aerobic or
anaerobic.
Enhanced aerobic bioremediation: Aerobic bioremediation is a
biotic process in which indigenous or supplemental microorganisms
(bioaugmentation) residing in soil and groundwater use oxygen as an electron
acceptor to biodegrade COCs. Degradation is accomplished when microbes transfer
electrons from the COCs (electron donor) to oxygen (electron acceptor) via
biological processes, and subsequently the COCs undergo transformation to less
harmful end products (generally water and CO2 gas). In order for the
microorganisms to proliferate, a sufficient amount of oxygen must be available.
In practice, oxygen is typically the principal growth-limiting factor for
COC-degrading microbes. Oxygen can be added using in-situ mechanical systems
(e.g. air sparging, soil vapor extraction, biosparging, bioventing); by
injecting industrial grade oxygen; through hydrogen peroxide infiltration; by
injecting a propriety compound; or by injecting ozone. Enhanced aerobic
bioremediation may treat most organic chemicals, but is generally a much less
aggressive technology than chemical oxidation.
Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation: Anaerobic bioremediation
is a biotic process in which microorganisms may utilize non-oxygen electron
acceptors to biodegrade COCs. Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation may also be
defined as the addition of an electron donor species to promote the reductive
dechlorination process. Non-oxygen electron acceptors include sulfate, nitrate,
ferric iron, manganese IV, or CO2. A sufficient amount of these electron
acceptors and/or substrates are required to sustain the biologically mediated
degradation of COCs. Anaerobic bioremediation may be a slower process than
aerobic, but it can efficiently degrade some compounds that are not reducing
aerobically, such as many chlorinated and non-chlorinated organics.
Bioaugmentation: Bioaugmentation involves introducing
microbes (non-native organisms) known to have a propensity to biodegrade
specific COCs. This technique may be utilized in the event that the existing
population of microorganisms is not adequately promoting the desired biologically
mediated reactions. This inoculation is typically conducted via injection or
periodic slug addition by gravity feed into an existing well network.
Carbon slurry bioremediation: This technology
uses activated carbon filled with tailor-made facultative microorganisms,
electron acceptors, and nutrients in an injectable slurry that first adsorbs
contaminants in-situ, and then promotes anaerobic biodegradation via oxidative
mechanisms of petroleum organics (primarily through sulfate reduction). It
immediately lowers observed COC concentrations in the impacted matrix (soil
and/or groundwater), as the activated carbon immobilizes the contamination,
where a more traditional biodegradation process takes place within the
activated carbon complex. During this process, groundwater quality is protected
through the cleanup cycle by the activated carbon's adsorptive capabilities.
Conclusion
 |
| Portable mixing systems allow the injectate to be prepared onsite and placed by pump or gravity as needed. |
|
These injection-based remediation technologies can require
additional upfront costs when compared to long-term cleanups, but overall cost
savings can be realized by avoiding years of monitoring, maintenance and
reporting costs. These new technologies can be applied at almost any impacted
site that would typically be approached using the standard in-situ or ex-situ remediation
technologies. In addition, injection technologies rival excavation/source
removal (with transportation/disposal costs soaring) when site closure is
required in the shortest timeframe possible.
Sites involved with real estate property transactions,
third-party liability concerns, or associated with sensitive receptors are
especially good candidates for injection-based remediation because an expedited
closure can be achieved. Injection technologies also rival traditional
remediation systems as contaminants are often destroyed in-situ, where many
traditional remediation systems often simply transfer contaminants from one
phase to another, which perpetuates liability from a contaminant exposure
perspective.
These new injection technologies are challenging
scientists and engineers to develop more thorough site conceptual models, and
obtain a more complete understanding of chemical and microbiological processes
to treat contaminants. Successful projects will most likely be achieved by understanding
where contaminants are found within the subsurface, how concentrated they are,
and what technologies or combination of technologies may be applied to
remediate them. PE
|